| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
SS2
Joined: 29 May 2007
Posts: 509
Location: The Woolyback, Bernicia
|
 Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2007 6:38 pm Post subject: Pathetic Pollis |
 |
|
Kev got pulled on Satda neet and got one of them Asbo for bikes thingies off an eedjitt plod.
Plod 1 was gonna do him for driving without due care and attention where he could've been looking at a possible 6 points and a 2 grand fine but eedjitt plod 2 got out of the car and 'let him off' with this ticket thingy where if he's caught being a naughty boy on his bike within 12 months it's impounded and he has to pay a daft sum to get it back.
Guess what he was doin that was dangerous!
He removed a hand from the handlebars to wipe the rain off his fekkin visor! Copper thinks this new law that lets them knick people for eating/smoking etc applies to bikers wanting to see where they're going, Prick.
I would've had the twat in court personally and being a MAG member and BMF affiliate I'd try and get their support and make it a test case as well. Flaming outrageous. I think I'll fire a letter off to Dave Short and see what he makes of it.
Kev if yer readin get the RN Barristers on to it, don't let the tossers get awaay with it or we're all doomed, doomed I tell ya..
_________________
Bugritt
|
|
| Back to top |
|
slightlymuddy
Joined: 30 May 2007
Posts: 270
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2007 6:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| bloody stupid, he should contact MAG and see if this has happened anywhere else. taking a hand off the bars to clear vision is no different to taking a hand off the steering wheel to change gear in a car. it is inappropriate use of the hands likely to hamper driving/riding that may be considered dangerous or distracting. if a bike has no indicators you must by law remove your hand from the bars to make a hand signal, whats the difference in this case?
_________________
woohoo another place to wibble on
|
|
| Back to top |
|
slightlymuddy
Joined: 30 May 2007
Posts: 270
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2007 6:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| hope you don't mind kev but I am forwarding this on to Archi anyway to see what MAG have to say about it, it affects all of us. they won't contact you obviously as they won't know who you are.
_________________
woohoo another place to wibble on
|
|
| Back to top |
|
kev
Joined: 12 Sep 2007
Posts: 217
Location: sum where near the bottom of a bottle of jack
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2007 8:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
| nee bother
_________________
woopdy-f#*king-do
|
|
| Back to top |
|
kev
Joined: 12 Sep 2007
Posts: 217
Location: sum where near the bottom of a bottle of jack
|
|
| Back to top |
|
SS2
Joined: 29 May 2007
Posts: 509
Location: The Woolyback, Bernicia
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2007 3:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Righto, What you've been given Kev is a Section 59 order which is intended to stop young uns tear arsing aboot shopping precincts on Steppas. Have a butchers at the link below from the Green Lane lot.
http://www.glass-uk.org/index2.php?option=com_content&do_pdf=1&id=267
According to this I reckon if you get your pet barrister to write to the Area Commander giving him the full story they'll have to strike it from your record You should never have been given a section 59 for riding a road legal bike on the road unless you were popping wheelies or summat. Let em have it.
_________________
Bugritt
|
|
| Back to top |
|
kev
Joined: 12 Sep 2007
Posts: 217
Location: sum where near the bottom of a bottle of jack
|
|
| Back to top |
|
SS2
Joined: 29 May 2007
Posts: 509
Location: The Woolyback, Bernicia
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2007 4:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Just sent an e-mail to David Short, former Chief Constable of Yorkshire (I think) and now MAG campaigns officer.
Proper boiled my pish this has!!! Wish it'd been me they'd pulled..
_________________
Bugritt
|
|
| Back to top |
|
kev
Joined: 12 Sep 2007
Posts: 217
Location: sum where near the bottom of a bottle of jack
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2007 4:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| cush not as much as mine dont even kna why i sighned for the bloody thing props just to keep them happy n the other male appendage from gettin his way.
_________________
woopdy-f#*king-do
|
|
| Back to top |
|
slightlymuddy
Joined: 30 May 2007
Posts: 270
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2007 5:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| kev when i get home i have another contact for you, a bikers barrister. what they did is illegal and Archi is gonna mention it within MAG. Lets make a big fuss over this sunshine, get the charge dropped and you an appology. Hopefully this wont happen again.
_________________
woohoo another place to wibble on
|
|
| Back to top |
|
kev
Joined: 12 Sep 2007
Posts: 217
Location: sum where near the bottom of a bottle of jack
|
|
| Back to top |
|
sparticus
Joined: 12 Nov 2007
Posts: 104
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2007 8:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
reminds me of the story when the frummblegrommit was pulled by the wallypop police
when he was riding his wallyfighter 1200 across the industrial plain of sunshine. the bloody buggers pilled him for riding naked and he didnt even have a headache. ne fun nowerdays cant have a good time for having a bad time. am sure he took his missadventure to the high table top in the corner and the big white wigged wally poped the misfortune into the fridge for later (i think that is a suspened sentance in our world??). poor frummblegrommitt, 76284 points and he still has an itchy toe
_________________
Immmmmmmmmm Sparticus
|
|
| Back to top |
|
SS2
Joined: 29 May 2007
Posts: 509
Location: The Woolyback, Bernicia
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2007 10:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Reply from David Short:
This seems a most bizarre and totally disproportionate application of the anti social behaviour legislation. What we are finding is that some cops are using the anti social behaviour legislation which has a much lower standard of proof than the criminal law. In any case the legislation is not correct for the circumstances you describe. If your brother was doing something wrong then they should report him for summons and be prepared to stand their ground in a court of law. If as I suspect they havn't got a hope in hell of securing any form of conviction they have tried to use this as a means of exerting authority, in a totally inapropriate way. In short they should put up or shut up!
My advice would be to submit a complaint against police for 'abuse of authority' and see what happens.
As I am sure you appreciate I am not a solicitor, ( though I was a police officer for 31 years, ending up as a Chief Superintendent and could probably lose and find some solicitors), and therefore I cannot guarantee that my advice would stand on its own merits. However if the circumstances are as you describe I think you have a very good case to have the Section 59 order withdrawn together with an apology from the police force concerned. Good luck and keep me posted, I am sure the motorcycle media would love to hear of the outcome.
Kind Regards David
There you go 'Abuse of authority' Get thon barrister to get a complaint in!
_________________
Bugritt
|
|
| Back to top |
|
kev
Joined: 12 Sep 2007
Posts: 217
Location: sum where near the bottom of a bottle of jack
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2007 10:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
| am workin on it bu he is in plymouth and am in scotland plus he is only doin it as a favour to me. cos we worked together. could take afew weeks yet.
_________________
woopdy-f#*king-do
|
|
| Back to top |
|
SS2
Joined: 29 May 2007
Posts: 509
Location: The Woolyback, Bernicia
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2007 1:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Been on to BMF this morning as well seeing as all us Shags are affiliated members. We'll see what the've got to say.
_________________
Bugritt
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
